Comparative Negligence: How Does it Impact Pedestrian Accident Claims in Arizona?

Pedestrian accidents are an unfortunate reality on Arizona’s roads, often leading to severe injuries and complex legal challenges. When such accidents occur, the question of fault becomes crucial, especially in determining compensation for the injured party. Arizona follows a legal doctrine known as comparative negligence, which plays a significant role in how pedestrian accident claims are assessed and resolved. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone involved in a pedestrian accident, as it directly impacts the potential outcome of a claim.

Quacy L. Smith

Founding Partner

James M. Green

Founding Partner

The Basics of Comparative Negligence in Arizona

In Arizona, comparative negligence is a legal principle that allocates fault among all parties involved in an accident. This means that in a pedestrian accident, the injured pedestrian may still recover damages even if they are partially at fault for the incident. However, the amount of compensation they receive will be reduced by their percentage of fault. This approach is rooted in fairness, acknowledging that accidents are often the result of multiple factors and that assigning 100 percent of the blame to one party may not be appropriate.

Arizona follows a “pure comparative negligence” system, which allows an injured party to recover damages even if they are 99 percent at fault for the accident. This is in contrast to states that follow a modified comparative negligence system, where an injured party may be barred from recovery if their fault exceeds a certain threshold, typically 50 percent. In Arizona, as long as the pedestrian bears some responsibility, they can still pursue a claim, though their recovery will be significantly diminished.

Determining Fault in Pedestrian Accidents

When a pedestrian accident occurs, the determination of fault is a complex process that involves examining the actions of both the driver and the pedestrian. Several factors come into play, including the speed of the vehicle, whether the pedestrian was crossing at a designated crosswalk, and if the driver was distracted or under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Similarly, the pedestrian’s actions are scrutinized to determine if they were jaywalking, ignoring traffic signals, or behaving in a manner that contributed to the accident.

In many cases, fault is not clear-cut, and both parties may share some degree of responsibility. For instance, a pedestrian may have been crossing the street outside of a crosswalk, but the driver may have been speeding or not paying attention. In such scenarios, Arizona’s comparative negligence laws would apply, with a jury or judge assigning a percentage of fault to each party based on the evidence presented.

Impact of Comparative Negligence on Compensation

The principle of comparative negligence directly affects the compensation an injured pedestrian can receive. Once fault is determined, the compensation is calculated by taking the total amount of damages and reducing it by the pedestrian’s percentage of fault. For example, if a pedestrian is found to be 20 percent at fault for an accident, and their total damages amount to $100,000, they would be entitled to recover $80,000.

This reduction in compensation underscores the importance of accurately determining fault in pedestrian accident cases. Insurance companies and defense attorneys often attempt to maximize the pedestrian’s percentage of fault to minimize the amount they have to pay. As a result, pedestrian accident victims must gather as much evidence as possible to support their claim and counter any attempts to shift blame onto them.

Legal Strategies for Navigating Comparative Negligence

Given the complexities of comparative negligence, it is crucial for pedestrian accident victims in Arizona to understand their legal rights and the strategies available to them. One of the most important steps is to seek legal representation from a firm that is well-versed in Arizona’s comparative negligence laws. An experienced attorney can help build a strong case by collecting evidence, interviewing witnesses, and working with accident reconstruction specialists to determine the true extent of fault.

In some cases, it may be necessary to challenge the findings of the insurance company or the defense, particularly if the pedestrian believes they are being unfairly blamed for the accident. A thorough investigation and a well-prepared legal argument can make a significant difference in the outcome of the case, potentially leading to a more favorable settlement or verdict.

Additionally, understanding the nuances of Arizona’s comparative negligence laws can help pedestrians avoid common pitfalls that could jeopardize their claim. For instance, admitting fault at the scene of the accident or during discussions with insurance adjusters can be used against the pedestrian later in the legal process. It is always advisable to consult with an attorney before making any statements or decisions that could impact the case.

Related Videos

provider:    youtube
url:         https://youtu.be/U08xcQc_SoE

src:         https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/U08xcQc_SoE?wmode=transparent&rel=0&feature=oembed
src mod:     https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/U08xcQc_SoE?wmode=transparent&rel=0
src gen:     https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/U08xcQc_SoE

provider:    youtube
url:         https://youtu.be/aqbAffPtego

src:         https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/aqbAffPtego?wmode=transparent&rel=0&feature=oembed
src mod:     https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/aqbAffPtego?wmode=transparent&rel=0
src gen:     https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/aqbAffPtego

The Role of Insurance in Comparative Negligence Cases

Insurance plays a critical role in pedestrian accident claims, particularly when it comes to comparative negligence. In Arizona, drivers are required to carry liability insurance, which covers damages to third parties, including pedestrians, in the event of an accident. However, the amount of coverage may vary, and in some cases, it may not be sufficient to cover the pedestrian’s damages fully.

When fault is shared, the insurance company will calculate the payout based on the pedestrian’s percentage of fault. If the pedestrian is found to be partially responsible, their compensation will be reduced accordingly. This can lead to situations where the pedestrian is left with significant out-of-pocket expenses, particularly if their injuries are severe and the insurance coverage is inadequate.

In cases where the pedestrian’s damages exceed the available insurance coverage, they may need to explore other options for recovery. This could include filing a personal injury lawsuit against the driver or seeking compensation through their own insurance policy, if applicable. Navigating these options can be challenging, especially when dealing with the complexities of comparative negligence, making legal representation essential.

Comparative Negligence in Hit-and-Run Accidents

Hit-and-run accidents present unique challenges in the context of comparative negligence. When a pedestrian is injured in a hit-and-run, the responsible driver may not be immediately identified, making it difficult to determine fault. In such cases, the pedestrian may need to rely on their own insurance coverage, such as uninsured motorist coverage, to recover damages.

If the driver is eventually identified, the comparative negligence analysis will come into play, just as in any other pedestrian accident case. However, the added difficulty of locating the driver and proving their fault can complicate the legal process. Pedestrians involved in hit-and-run accidents should seek legal counsel as soon as possible to ensure their rights are protected and to explore all available avenues for compensation.

Protecting Your Rights After a Pedestrian Accident

Pedestrian accidents can have life-altering consequences, both physically and financially. Understanding how comparative negligence impacts your claim is crucial to ensuring you receive the compensation you deserve. The legal process can be daunting, particularly when fault is contested, and the stakes are high.

If you or a loved one has been involved in a pedestrian accident in Arizona, it is important to act quickly to protect your rights. Gathering evidence, seeking medical attention, and consulting with an attorney are all critical steps that can influence the outcome of your case. Delays in taking action can result in lost evidence or missed opportunities to challenge fault determinations, potentially reducing your ability to recover damages.

Comparative negligence adds a layer of complexity to pedestrian accident claims, making it all the more important to have knowledgeable legal representation on your side. An experienced attorney can guide you through the legal process, advocate on your behalf, and work to maximize your recovery, even if you are found to be partially at fault for the accident.

Pedestrian accidents in Arizona are governed by the principle of comparative negligence, which can significantly impact the compensation an injured pedestrian receives. Understanding how this legal doctrine works and how it applies to your case is essential for protecting your rights and ensuring a fair outcome. By working with a law firm that understands the intricacies of Arizona’s comparative negligence laws, you can navigate the legal process with confidence and pursue the compensation you need to move forward with your life.

If you or someone you know has been injured in a pedestrian accident, don’t wait to seek legal assistance. The team at Smith & Green, Attorneys At Law, P.L.L.C., is here to help you understand your rights and guide you through the complexities of your case. Contact us today to discuss your situation and learn how we can assist you in pursuing the compensation you deserve.