Arizona Laws Governing Premises Liability and Negligent Security

Premises liability and negligent security laws in Arizona play a critical role in ensuring that property owners maintain safe environments for those who visit their premises. These laws are designed to protect individuals who might suffer injuries or harm due to unsafe conditions or security failures on someone else’s property. Whether you are visiting a friend’s home, a business, or even a public space, it is important to understand your rights under Arizona law when it comes to premises liability and negligent security.

Arizona has established rules that hold property owners accountable for the safety of their premises. The law recognizes that if someone is invited onto the property for any lawful purpose, the owner has a duty to ensure that the visitor is not exposed to unnecessary risk or harm. This responsibility extends not only to the physical safety of the property but also to providing adequate security measures in certain cases. Premises liability and negligent security cases can arise from a wide range of incidents, including slip and fall accidents, broken or unsafe structures, and criminal activities that occur due to inadequate security. At, Smith & Green, Attorneys At Law, P.L.L.C. , we are here to guide you through the legal process and help you navigate the complexities of your case.

Quacy L. Smith

Founding Partner

James M. Green

Founding Partner

What Is Premises Liability?

Premises liability refers to the legal responsibility that property owners have to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition. If a person suffers an injury on someone else’s property due to unsafe conditions, the owner may be held liable for those injuries. Arizona law recognizes several types of visitors who may be on someone else’s property, and the level of responsibility owed to each visitor can vary depending on their legal status.

In Arizona, there are three main categories of visitors: invitees, licensees, and trespassers. An invitee is someone who is invited onto the property for a business-related reason, such as a customer in a store. A licensee is someone who is invited onto the property for non-business reasons, like a social guest. Trespassers, on the other hand, enter the property without permission. The level of care a property owner must provide depends on the category of the visitor. Invitees are owed the highest level of care, and property owners must take reasonable steps to ensure their safety. For licensees, the owner must warn of known dangers that may not be obvious. Trespassers are generally not owed the same duty of care, but there are exceptions in cases involving children or intentional harm.

When it comes to proving a premises liability claim in Arizona, the injured person must demonstrate that the property owner knew or should have known about the dangerous condition and failed to address it. This can include situations where a business owner fails to clean up a spill that causes a slip and fall accident or does not repair broken stairs that lead to an injury. The key to these cases is showing that the property owner was negligent in maintaining the safety of their premises.

Understanding Negligent Security

Negligent security is a subset of premises liability that deals specifically with the failure to provide adequate security measures on a property. In certain situations, property owners have a responsibility to take reasonable steps to protect visitors from criminal activities. If a property owner fails to implement proper security measures and a person is injured as a result, the owner can be held liable for negligent security.

Negligent security cases often involve crimes like assaults, robberies, or other violent acts that could have been prevented if the property owner had taken appropriate steps to safeguard the area. For example, a shopping mall or apartment complex might be expected to provide security personnel, well-lit areas, and functioning surveillance cameras to deter criminal behavior. If these measures are not in place and a visitor is harmed due to a crime, the property owner may be held responsible for failing to provide a safe environment.

In Arizona, courts consider several factors when determining whether a property owner is liable for negligent security. These factors include the type of property, the crime rate in the area, whether similar crimes have occurred on the premises before, and what security measures were in place at the time of the incident. Property owners are not expected to prevent every crime, but they must take reasonable steps to address foreseeable risks. Failing to do so can result in liability if a visitor is injured or harmed due to criminal activity.

Related Videos

provider:    youtube
url:         https://youtu.be/U08xcQc_SoE

src:         https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/U08xcQc_SoE?wmode=transparent&rel=0&feature=oembed
src mod:     https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/U08xcQc_SoE?wmode=transparent&rel=0
src gen:     https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/U08xcQc_SoE

provider:    youtube
url:         https://youtu.be/aqbAffPtego

src:         https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/aqbAffPtego?wmode=transparent&rel=0&feature=oembed
src mod:     https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/aqbAffPtego?wmode=transparent&rel=0
src gen:     https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/aqbAffPtego

Common Incidents Leading to Premises Liability and Negligent Security Claims

Several types of incidents can lead to premises liability or negligent security claims in Arizona. One of the most common examples of a premises liability case is a slip and fall accident. These accidents can occur in various settings, from grocery stores to office buildings, and are often the result of wet floors, uneven surfaces, or poorly maintained walkways. If the property owner was aware of the hazard but did not take steps to fix it or warn visitors, they can be held liable for any injuries that result.

Another common type of premises liability case involves falling objects. Items that are not properly secured can fall and cause serious injury to anyone in the vicinity. These cases can occur in retail settings where merchandise is stored on high shelves or in construction areas where equipment is not properly stowed.

In terms of negligent security claims, incidents such as robberies, assaults, or sexual attacks can lead to legal action if the property owner failed to implement appropriate security measures. For instance, if an apartment complex has a history of criminal activity but does not provide adequate lighting, security guards, or cameras, the owner could be held responsible for injuries resulting from a crime.

It is important to note that in both premises liability and negligent security cases, the injured person must prove that the property owner’s negligence caused the injury or harm. This can be a complex process, requiring evidence that demonstrates the unsafe condition or lack of security directly led to the incident.

Arizona’s Comparative Negligence Rule

Arizona follows the legal principle of comparative negligence when it comes to personal injury claims, including those involving premises liability and negligent security. Comparative negligence means that if a person is partially responsible for their own injury, their compensation may be reduced by the percentage of fault they share. For example, if a person is injured in a slip and fall accident but was not paying attention to where they were walking, the court may determine that they were partially at fault for their own injury. In such cases, their compensation would be reduced by the percentage of responsibility they bear.

This rule allows injured parties to recover damages even if they were partially at fault for the incident, as long as they were not entirely to blame. It is important to understand that the property owner’s negligence must still be a significant factor in the injury, and the comparative negligence rule only applies when both parties share responsibility for the incident.

Time Limits for Filing a Premises Liability or Negligent Security Claim in Arizona

Arizona law imposes time limits, known as statutes of limitations, on filing personal injury claims, including those involving premises liability and negligent security. In most cases, the injured person has two years from the date of the injury to file a lawsuit. However, there are exceptions to this rule that may extend or shorten the filing period, depending on the circumstances of the case. For instance, if the injury involves a government entity, a claim must be filed within a much shorter time frame.

It is essential to act promptly after an injury to ensure that you do not miss the deadline for filing your claim. Waiting too long can result in the loss of your right to seek compensation for your injuries. Consulting with an attorney can help you understand the specific time limits that apply to your case and ensure that all necessary steps are taken to protect your rights.

If you or a loved one has been injured on someone else’s property due to unsafe conditions or inadequate security, it is important to seek legal guidance as soon as possible. Navigating the legal process can be challenging, especially when dealing with complex premises liability and negligent security laws. An experienced attorney can help you understand your rights, gather the necessary evidence to support your claim, and represent you in court if needed.

The team at Smith & Green, Attorneys At Law, P.L.L.C. is here to assist you with your premises liability or negligent security case. Our firm understands the impact that these types of injuries can have on your life, and we are committed to helping you pursue the compensation you deserve. Contact us today for a consultation to discuss your case and learn more about how we can help you protect your rights and achieve a favorable outcome.