Mortgage Fraud: A Complete Guide

At Smith & Green, Attorneys at Law, we recognize that homeownership is one of the most significant investments individuals make in their lifetime. Unfortunately, mortgage fraud can jeopardize this important investment — even for law-abiding buyers. Mortgage fraud not only affects the financial stability of homeowners, but also undermines the integrity of the housing market in Arizona.

In this blog post, we will delve into the complexities of mortgage fraud. Whether you are a potential homebuyer, a current homeowner, or a real estate professional, understanding the signs of mortgage fraud and knowing how to protect yourself is crucial. 

Quote

My loved one recently hired Smith & Green Attorneys of Law. They were awesome. They went the extra mile to make sure everything was taken care of. They really take care of their clients. They took the time to answer questions and to explain in detail what was happening, step by step.
Totally recommend their service.”

- Juanita McMillan

Quote

This is an exceptionally great law firm, everyone is extremely helpful, knowledgeable and makes sure to be there with you every step of the way. I spoke to Rylan Williams whom is an amazing legal assistant, he clarified my every concern and the communication has been great from the beginning, thanks to him I was able to be at ease knowing my issue is in the best hands possible at Smith & Green Law Firm."

- Adriah Williams

Quote

I had a fantastic experience with this law firm! Their team was extremely knowledgeable, responsive, and professional throughout the entire process. They guided me step by step and helped me achieve a successful outcome. Highly recommend!"

- Sika S.

What is Mortgage Fraud?

Mortgage fraud involves the intentional misrepresentation or omission of information on a mortgage loan application to obtain a loan or a larger loan than would have been permitted if the truth were known. This type of fraud is designed to benefit the perpetrator and can occur at various stages of the mortgage process.

Types of Mortgage Fraud

Mortgage fraud can be categorized into two main types: fraud for profit and fraud for housing. Fraud for profit is typically carried out by industry professionals such as real estate agents, mortgage brokers, appraisers, and bank officers, with the goal of making a profit by manipulating the lending process. Common schemes in this category include property flipping with inflated appraisals, equity skimming, and straw buyer schemes.

On the other hand, fraud for housing is generally committed by individual borrowers who provide false information on their loan applications to obtain a mortgage they would not otherwise qualify for. This type of fraud involves misrepresenting income, employment history, or occupancy intentions.

How Mortgage Fraud is Conducted

Mortgage fraud can be perpetrated through various schemes, each employing different tactics to deceive lenders and gain financial benefits. One common method is income and employment fraud, where applicants falsify their income and employment details to appear more financially stable and capable of repaying the loan than they actually are. This may involve creating fake pay stubs, W-2 forms, or even establishing fictitious employers.

Another tactic is property flipping. Fraudsters purchase a property, falsely inflate its value through fraudulent appraisals, and then sell it quickly at a much higher price. The subsequent buyer, often a straw buyer or a complicit party, secures a loan based on the inflated value, allowing the fraudsters to pocket the difference.

Straw buyer schemes involve an individual who allows their name and credit history to be used to obtain a mortgage for someone else, typically in exchange for a fee. The actual buyer may have poor credit or other disqualifying factors. The straw buyer may not occupy the property and is often unaware of the full extent of the fraud.

Equity skimming is another fraudulent practice where an investor uses a straw buyer to obtain a property with little or no money down and then rents it out. The investor collects the rental income but fails to make the mortgage payments, eventually leading to foreclosure. The investor walks away with the rental income, leaving the lender with a defaulted loan.

Appraisal fraud involves inflating the value of the property to secure a larger loan amount. This can be done by manipulating comparable sales data, coercing or colluding with appraisers, or providing false information about the property’s condition and location.

Identity theft is a tactic where criminals steal someone’s identity to secure a mortgage loan. The victim’s credit is used to obtain the loan, but the fraudsters benefit from the loan proceeds, leaving the victim with the debt and damage to their credit history.

Related Videos

Choosing a Criminal Defense Attorney

Public Defender or Private Attorney

How Mortgage Fraud is Discovered

Mortgage fraud is often discovered through a combination of routine audits, whistleblower tips, and suspicious activity reports. Financial institutions routinely conduct audits and reviews of loan applications and documents. Any discrepancies, inconsistencies, or signs of tampering can trigger a deeper investigation into potential fraud. During the underwriting process, lenders verify the information provided by applicants. Discrepancies in income, employment history, or property valuations can raise red flags, prompting further scrutiny.

Real estate agents, mortgage brokers, appraisers, and other industry professionals who encounter suspicious activities may report their findings to authorities or their compliance departments. Additionally, employees or associates involved in the fraudulent scheme or who become aware of it may provide tips to regulatory bodies or law enforcement. Financial institutions are required to file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) when they detect potential fraud. These reports can lead to investigations by regulatory bodies or law enforcement agencies.

Regulatory agencies and law enforcement use public records and advanced data analysis tools to identify patterns indicative of mortgage fraud. Unusual spikes in property values, frequent flipping of properties, or multiple loans to the same individuals can signal fraudulent activities.

Related Videos

Stages of a Civil Case

Do I Have a Case?

How Mortgage Fraud is Investigated

When mortgage fraud is suspected, a thorough investigation begins, involving several critical steps. First, investigators gather all relevant documents, such as loan applications, financial statements, property appraisals, and transaction records, along with electronic communications like emails and text messages. Forensic accountants and fraud examiners then analyze these financial records and documents to identify signs of manipulation, misrepresentation, or forgery.

Next, investigators conduct interviews and depositions with individuals involved in the mortgage transaction, including borrowers, lenders, real estate agents, and appraisers, to uncover inconsistencies and gather firsthand accounts. Law enforcement agencies work closely with regulatory bodies, such as the Arizona Department of Financial Institutions (AZDFI) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), to share information and resources.

If necessary, investigators obtain subpoenas or search warrants to access additional records and conduct searches of premises for further evidence. Advanced data analysis tools are also employed to identify patterns and anomalies in large datasets, helping investigators pinpoint fraudulent activities.

Penalties for Mortgage Fraud Under Arizona Law

Mortgage fraud is a serious offense under Arizona law, carrying significant penalties. The specific penalties depend on the nature and extent of the fraud, as well as the defendant’s criminal history. Here are some of the potential penalties for mortgage fraud in Arizona:

Class 2 Felony: Mortgage fraud involving significant amounts of money. particularly egregious conduct, or a pattern of criminality can be charged as a Class 2 felony. Penalties include:

– Prison sentence of 3 to 12.5 years for a first offense.

– Longer sentences for repeat offenders.

– Fines up to $150,000 for individuals and $1,000,000 for organizations.

Class 4 Felony: Less severe cases of mortgage fraud may be charged as a Class 4 felony. Penalties include:

– Prison sentence of 1 to 3.75 years for a first offense.

– Fines up to $150,000 for individuals and $1,000,000 for organizations.

Restitution: Defendants convicted of mortgage fraud may be required to pay restitution to victims for financial losses incurred as a result of the fraud.

Probation: In some cases, the court may impose probation instead of a prison sentence, particularly for first-time offenders. Probation conditions may include community service, financial counseling, and regular reporting to a probation officer.

Civil Penalties: In addition to criminal penalties, individuals and organizations involved in mortgage fraud may face civil lawsuits from victims seeking compensation for their losses.

Quacy L. Smith

Founding Partner

James M. Green

Founding Partner

Possible Mortgage Fraud Defense Strategies

Lack of Intent

One of the primary elements of mortgage fraud is the intent to deceive. A successful defense might involve demonstrating that the defendant did not have the intention to commit fraud. This could be due to misunderstanding or unintentional errors in the application process. Showing that any misstatements were inadvertent rather than deliberate can be a strong defense.

Insufficient Evidence

Challenging the sufficiency of the prosecution’s evidence is a fundamental defense strategy. The defense can argue that the evidence presented does not meet the burden of proof required to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This involves scrutinizing the evidence for inconsistencies, gaps, or lack of credibility.

Mistaken Identity

In cases where multiple parties are involved, it is possible that the defendant is wrongly accused. A mistaken identity defense involves demonstrating that someone else committed fraudulent acts. This strategy can be effective if there is evidence pointing to another individual who had access to the information and the opportunity to commit fraud.

Duress or Coercion

If the defendant was forced to commit mortgage fraud under threats or coercion, this can be used as a defense. Duress involves showing that the defendant acted under immediate threat of harm and had no reasonable opportunity to escape the situation. Evidence of threats or coercion, such as communications or witness testimony, can support this defense.

Entrapment

Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers induce a person to commit a crime that they otherwise would not have committed. To use this defense, it must be shown that the defendant was not predisposed to commit the crime and was persuaded by authorities to engage in fraudulent activities. This defense is applicable if undercover agents or informants were involved in setting up the fraud.

Good Faith Reliance

This defense involves demonstrating that the defendant relied on the advice or actions of a professional, such as a mortgage broker, real estate agent, or financial advisor, in good faith. If the defendant believed the information provided was accurate and acted accordingly, it can negate the intent to deceive. Documentation of the professional advice and communication records can support this defense.

Lack of Material Misrepresentation

For a mortgage fraud charge to hold, the misrepresentation must be material, meaning it must have significantly influenced the lender’s decision to approve the loan. The defense can argue that the alleged false information was not material and would not have affected the loan’s approval. Demonstrating that the lender would have granted the loan regardless of the misrepresentation can weaken the prosecution’s case.

Statute of Limitations

The statute of limitations sets a time limit for prosecuting certain crimes. If the alleged mortgage fraud occurred outside this time frame, the defense can move to have the charges dismissed. In Arizona, the statute of limitations for mortgage fraud typically ranges from three to seven years, depending on the specifics of the case.

Defending against mortgage fraud charges in Arizona requires a nuanced approach that considers the specific facts and circumstances of each case. By employing strategies such as demonstrating lack of intent, challenging the sufficiency of evidence, and proving good faith reliance, defendants can effectively challenge the allegations against them.

Advocating for Arizonans

Mortgage fraud is a serious offense that can result in severe legal consequences, including substantial fines and lengthy prison sentences. Understanding the complexities of mortgage fraud and the potential defense strategies available is crucial for anyone facing such charges. The stakes are high, and having experienced legal representation can make all the difference in protecting your rights and securing a favorable outcome.

At Smith & Green, Attorneys at Law, we are committed to providing legal defense for individuals accused of mortgage fraud. Our experienced team understands the intricacies of these cases and will work diligently to build a robust defense on your behalf. If you are facing mortgage fraud charges, don’t navigate this challenging situation alone. Contact Smith & Green, Attorneys at Law today for a consultation. Let us help you protect your future and achieve the best possible resolution for your case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *